Posts Tagged ‘new idea’

A quick note before you spend $6,000…

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Hi all.

We’re looking to license the cup holder as an easier way to get it out to the world. (Those people who AREN’T dedicated readers like yourselves.) One of the companies we’ve come across is a company called Davison out of Pittsburgh, PA. Davison’s bread and butter claim’s to take an inventor’s idea, and to the sum of $10k to $15k they will do an initial patent search, do design work yielding a workable product, make a prototype, and then attempt to license it out. Since the “Nearly” Universal OH cup holder is already in existence, we were directed to the licensing department and asked to pay $6,000.00 US, plus 10% on any royalties we would receive, and the company “guaranteed” they would submit it to 45 companies specifically targetted for our drink holder. Handling this matter personally, when I asked for references, I was told they have a strict privacy policy, and no references would be allowed. Fair enough, but could my email address and phone number be given to current clients who might be interested to share their experience? Negative, they don’t do that. Okay, so more or less I’m supposed to pay $6,000 with no guarantee and no actual person to talk to about their experience with Davison? When I pushed for a non-company reference I was directed to the corporate website, which contained a few. Push me to the web, I’ll go to the web, and lucky for us I found references, a lot of bad ones.

I went to Google (which I urge EVERYONE to do when dealing with a company, especially something that sounds too good to be true) and did a search for “davison licensing reviews” and found a few results. Most were calling the company a scam, and although it’s not an exact scam (some people did claim however they paid $10,000 to $15,000 and never received a prototype of their idea) it is important to note (from this Forbe’s magazine article on Davison) that the company does in fact make most of it’s money from the design process, and only a small fraction of a percent of its income comes from royalties of sucessfully licensed products. Another big problem stated by the website (here’s the website for Davison complaints) was that the company’s customer service was horrible once you handed over your money.

Key lessons to be learned here.

1.) The internet is a wonderful tool, so use it. If something sounds too good to be true, don’t assume it is, just check it out on Google. Although you’re rarely find positive reviews (keep this in mind if you find nothing on a company or service as that might be a good thing) if people are unhappy, you’ll definitely find out it’s not worth doing and why the person feels that way. Another good place to search after Google is the Better Business Bureau, of which Davison also had like 200+ complaints.

2.) The design process is expensive. Although I’m personally unsure of the follow through on their services (since I will now not be paying them), Davison’s price tag for the design budget is in the ballpark. I think for the design and patent application itself was right around $12k for our universal cup holder. I would suggest not cutting any corners though, and if you’re truly confident in an idea (and you can find more helpful info on the patent process on our blog) take the time to meet with a patent attorney and at least do an initial patent search. Should the results be positive, look for a qualified design firm (usually an engineering firm) that you can work personally with to monitor how your funds are being used.

Other than that, good luck, and it’s still possible to bring a product to market, just don’t expect it to happen overnight.

What to expect from the patent process.

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

It is quite imperative for inventors and companies that bring out new products to be able to protect their inventions. His is why they need the services of patent firms that specialize in providing patent and application protection as this helps them in protecting their intellectual property from pilferage.

Getting a patent is not a very simple process as it could be quite long drawn out (as we learned by patenting our universal drink holder). There are quite a few process and procedural steps where the patent application is scrutinized by the patent examiner and clarifications sought from the inventor. The process starts with the inventor making an application for a patent, and the application as well as the invention being scrutinized to ascertain as to which part of the invention can be patented. If the patent application and the invention stands up to scrutiny, a patent is granted for a pre-defined period of time.

There are all kinds of inventions that are of varied scope. Some inventions do nothing more than add a concept to the vast body of concepts that exist from earlier. Take for instance a car video game. There could be a host of ideas and features like the car being turbo boosted or even damage to the car in the event of collisions. To this, if you add the novelty of showing how the racer is progressing on a race track map, this idea of racer display on the map could well be patented. Those who are still not prepared to file for a full fledged patent can file a ‘provisional patent application’. The advantage of patents is that these can catapult young inventors to global fame and name, not to mention the monetary benefits that accrue from it.

When filing for a patent application, it makes sense to submit formal drawings of the invention. These drawings help in projecting the image of the invention in all its distinctiveness and uniqueness. These drawings are prepared by trained draftsmen, who have long years of experience in this field. Once the idea of the invention has been conceived, design patents are prepared, which are an aesthetic representation of the form of the invention in question. The tenure of design patents is generally 14 years.

There are other kinds of patents which are of the nature of utility patents. These patents are able to protect the use of machines, medicines, components and computers in addition to ingredients which add to the utility of the invention. These patents are handed out for novel machines or even processes and are distinct from design patents that are appropriate for inventors of new manufactured articles. The concept of provisional utility patents is rather rare and not apt at an elementary level.

Manufacturers also have a great utility for patents because they invest huge sums and need to protect the uniqueness of their invention. The idea behind giving a 17 year manufacturing patent is to reward innovativeness as it is beneficial to consumers. While unrestricted monopoly is not beneficial, the idea of a 17 years patent seems to be a kind of middle path. Inventions that come prior to an invention are know as ‘prior art’. The way to get a patent on your invention is to prove that your innovation is quite distinctive and is a significant improvement on the prior art.

What to do with that next great idea.

Wednesday, December 16th, 2009

The scope of new products in the contemporary world is seemingly unending. A lot of companies and people look at getting data from other people who are a repository of information as well as ideas. It is possible to look at getting new product ideas based on exposing, recombining and surfacing data, with the internet being a fast and vast new medium of sharing and utilizing the data in a manner that helps cultivate new innovations.

Companies generally have a well set manner for laying out new product innovation. Ideas get sent from the business manager to the strategic committee that conducts the preliminary feasibility test after which regular reviews by the engineering team is conducted to make progress on the project.

The inputs from the developer or the development team are quite important as new product development is a tough task. It needs conversion of complex ideas into practical products which means that applied research is used as the input with development being the throughput and the finished marketable product being the output. Developers also take into account the kind of costs that are required to bring the product into fruition.

Past research is an indicator of what has already been done and not necessarily of what is needed for the future. It is also possible to use computer aided design (CAD) to visualize the product and also propel it towards better execution and implementation. Research teams can help, as they do a good job in predicting trends that will become big in future. They also test out ideas or concepts so that one may be able to access the chances of a product succeeding.

Some people are fast to take on and use new products. These people are called early adopters. There are others who take a little more time to adopt it and are known as the early majority. The late majority are those who are averse to risk, while there are the laggards that are quite resistant to change. These laggards may even take on products that have become the norm and quite well entrenched in the market.

You can use market research to ascertain the demand for a product and the kind of price that would be acceptable. A prototype may also be used to visualize the product (which we had made numberous times with our drink holder). Market research helps in factoring in the trends in the market too.

It is always better to make a product in the early life style stage of a product to maximize the potential of the product. Product design takes into account engineering, style and cost constraints too. Patents involve legal hassles that need to be factored in also.